Re: row vectors changed to column vectors?

[Christian T. Steigies]

On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 11:59:43AM -0600, Mike Miller wrote:
> >
> > Yes, it is slow, what do you suggest? Should I create a matrix with
> > zero(N,1) first? Looks as if it is just a few ms difference.
> 
> If N is 1000000, is it still just a matter of a few ms?  For small N there
> well be very little difference.  I think the zeros(N,1) method is good.

1e6 might be a little hard on my notebook, especially when I need to create
a NxN matrix out of it. For small N it does not seem to make a difference at
all, the rest of the algorithm is way more inefficient. But in my case, N
wont be too large. Thanks anyway, I can sure use that later on.

> If you can be more exlicit about what you're doing (e.g., with "gluing"
> and "rotating"), we might help you better.

Sorry, I lack the mathematical terms for that, but this is solved thanks to
Przemek Klosowski, Paul Kienzle, and toeplitz().

Christian



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------