[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linking inside of pattern rules
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Linking inside of pattern rules |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Jan 2020 11:47:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.34.1-2 |
On Sun, 2019-12-22 at 17:02 +0000, Bogdan wrote:
> I'd also like to be able to link each executable with the appropriate set
> of libraries. However, I'm not entirely sure how to select them when the
> pattern rule gets executed (other than a hacky solution, like associating
> each executable with a .link file and then doing something like $(CC)
> $(LDFLAGS) -o $@ $< `cat $@.link` but that's pretty horrid).
>
> I should note that I am trying to limit myself to POSIX make, including
> features coming to Issue 8 of the specification (there are quite a few
> things that GNU Make already has, fortunately). But if that's not at all
> possible, I might use a GNU Make-specific feature.
I don't really understand what you're trying to do; an example might help.
However, from what I do understand why don't you use recursive variable
names? This feature is widely available in all versions of make and I
think it's going to be added to the standard:
exe1_LIBS = -lfoo -lbar
exe2_LIBS = -lbiz -lbaz
exe%: ...
... $($@_LIBS)
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Linking inside of pattern rules,
Paul Smith <=