Re: anything special about "." prefixed targets other than default?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, Paul Smith wrote:

> On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 10:18 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >   i'm looking at someone else's Makefile, and it is replete with
> > targets whose names begin with a period. i'm aware of the property
> > that such targets will not be considered as the default, but once you
> > define a few early targets, is there any value in continuing to have
> > period-prefixed targets?
> >
> >   in this Makefile, there are a number of "paired" targets such as:
> >
> >   clean_mystuff:
> >   .clean_mystuff_fail:
> >
> > which seems to suggest some kind of pattern, but i have no idea what
> > it might be.
>
> make itself doesn't treat targets starting with '.' any differently;
> this must be a coding convention for these makefiles specifically.

  apparently, after further investigation, this is exactly what it is
... an internal convention for targets that are not meant to be called
directly by the user. is that a well-known idiom?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                         http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================