[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: secondexpansion interference
From: |
Martin d'Anjou |
Subject: |
Re: secondexpansion interference |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:16:39 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 |
On 14-04-27 09:11 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
I do have gettext 0.18.1, but it is installed locally in my home
directory. How do I specify an alternative location for gettext to
autoreconf -i?
I think you need to use the -B (--prepend-dir) flag to autoreconf and
add the aclocal directory for your local gettext.
However, it might be simpler to just edit the configure.ac file in your
make directory and change the AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION value to the
version you have installed by default. That probably will work well
enough for your purposes. There's an issue with older versions of
GETTEXT on _some_ platforms (for some reason I'm thinking Solaris) but
it shouldn't be a problem on Linux.
To get passed the gettext problem, I changed configure.ac like so:
AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.17])
#AM_PROG_AR
m4_pattern_allow([AM_PROG_AR], [AM_PROG_AR])
Next, when I run ./configure --prefix=..., I get:
./configure: line 8834: PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG: command not found
./configure: line 8846: syntax error near unexpected token `GUILE,'
./configure: line 8846: ` PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GUILE, guile-2.0,
have_guile=yes,'
I also tried --with-guile=no but that did not work. I have pkg-config
0.28 in my path.
Martin
- secondexpansion interference, Martin d'Anjou, 2014/04/25
- Re: secondexpansion interference, Philip Guenther, 2014/04/25
- Re: secondexpansion interference, Martin d'Anjou, 2014/04/26
- Re: secondexpansion interference, Paul Smith, 2014/04/26
- Re: secondexpansion interference, Martin d'Anjou, 2014/04/27
- Re: secondexpansion interference, Paul Smith, 2014/04/27
- Re: secondexpansion interference,
Martin d'Anjou <=
- Re: secondexpansion interference, Martin d'Anjou, 2014/04/27
- Re: secondexpansion interference, Paul Smith, 2014/04/27
Re: secondexpansion interference, Paul Smith, 2014/04/27