|
From: | Noel Yap |
Subject: | Re: for sub in $(SUBMAKES); but $(SUBMAKES) is empty |
Date: | Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:11:26 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040212) |
Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% Boris Kolpackov <address@hidden> writes: bk> I just checked SUS v3 and it says it's legal. You're right; they must have changed that since the first POSIX spec. That's good... but nevertheless that syntax is not portable :).
Isn't this similar to one of your rules on how to write portable makefiles? Don't, instead install a portable make (ie GNU make) Applied to this situation, install a portable shell :-)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |