Re: "_t" type names, and other coding style alternatives

[Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos]

On 10/09/2012 08:58 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:


>       There isn't a formal standard reserving those, but there's a
>       convention of using _p for “predicates” (both boolean variables,
>       like done_p; and boolean functions, like writable_p (fp).)
>       Thus, it may be better to use _ptr or _pt instead.


Didn't like any of those. I just dropped the _t.

regards,
Nikos