help-libtasn1
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] cleanup _asn1_copy_structure3


From: Tim Ruehsen
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup _asn1_copy_structure3
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:48:43 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-3-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )

Am Monday 03 September 2012 schrieb Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos:
> On 08/31/2012 04:23 PM, Tim Ruehsen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > a patch to simplify/cleanup _asn1_copy_structure3().
> 
> I noticed that you moved the check
> +       if (p_s == source_node)
> +         break;
> 
> within the if (move != UP). Couldn't this occur otherwise?

To be shure, copy
  if (p_s == source_node)
    break;

right before the 'continue' statement.

Right now, after having taken a deeper look into the sources, I personally 
dislike the source code. It is unnecessary complex, i would say hard to 
maintain. I really can't find any of the stated "high quality" code.

Tree structure handling and content handling should be seperated.
Aren't there any well-tested tree library routines (e.g. GNU t* functions) 
that could be used for adding, deleting, searching and walking ?.

> By seeing the _asn1_copy_structure2() and its usage from
> asn1_create_element(), it seems there can be quite some optimizations by
> adding a new asn1_create_element2() and a new asn1_array2tree2().
> The newc array2tree should create a special tree that is easy to copy.
> It doesn't look like much work, but I cannot afford it now at least.

I think, GnuTLS should have a tool to be able to convert .PEM files into 
simple text files which could be read into a simple C structure by a trivial 
routine. That would massively reduce complexity and resource usage (CPU, 
Memory) and speed up GnuTLS startup.

> 
> regards,
> Nikos

Regards,
     Tim



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]