[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
From: |
Andreas Voegele |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles) |
Date: |
19 Mar 2002 08:32:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Thomas Bushnell writes:
> Jeroen Dekkers <jeroen@dekkers.cx> writes:
>
> > Yes, but I can't find a rationale for the /sbin directory.
>
> It is for programs which are "only generally useful to system
> administrators".
Who decides what is only useful to system administrators?
Only Solaris systems, ping is in /usr/sbin. On Debian, it is in /bin.
On the other hand, traceroute is in /usr/sbin. I can't see much
difference between ping and traceroute as far as the usefulness for
users is concerned.
I know that the ping vs. traceroute topic has been discussed on
debian-devel and I don't think that /sbin should be given up.
But programs should not be left in /sbin for historical reasons.
And programs that are only useful to system administrators on
GNU/Linux systems should be moved from /sbin to /bin if they are
useful to normal users on the Hurd.
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), (continued)
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Guy Bormann, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Guy Bormann, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), B. Douglas Hilton, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/19
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles),
Andreas Voegele <=
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/19
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/19
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/19
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), kreuter, 2002/03/20
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/20
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Niels Möller, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Oystein Viggen, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Mark Ellis, 2002/03/23
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/23