[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix's enchant misreports numerals on Debian---both buster and bulls
|
From: |
Jorge P . de Morais Neto |
|
Subject: |
Re: Guix's enchant misreports numerals on Debian---both buster and bullseye |
|
Date: |
Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:45:56 -0300 |
Em [2020-08-20 qui 15:35:00-0300], Jorge P. de Morais Neto escreveu:
> So enchant 2.2.8 (either from APT or from Guix) does not understand
> "doesn't"; and, what's worse, enchant-2.2.8 from Guix reports every
> numeral as a misspelling.
I now reread my experiment and realized enchant from Guix does
understand "doesn't". So enchant 2.2.8 from Guix gets "doesn't"
correctly, but not numerals, and enchant 2.2.8 from APT gets numerals
correctly, but not "doesn't". Could enchant get both numerals and
"doesn't" correctly? That would be ideal. Failing that, APT's enchant
situation is much preferable than Guix's enchant.
Regards
--
- <https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/>
- If an email of mine arrives at your spam box, please notify me.
- Please adopt free/libre formats like PDF, ODF, Org, LaTeX, Opus, WebM and 7z.
- Free/libre software for Replicant, LineageOS and Android: https://f-droid.org
- [[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html][What is free software?]]