[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Controling requirements when packaging haskell modules
From: |
Tonton |
Subject: |
Re: Controling requirements when packaging haskell modules |
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2018 14:11:57 +0200 |
On Mon, 14 May 2018 13:20:48 +0200
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >> You should not package ghc-array, ghc-containers, or ghc-binary — these
> >> are all provided by GHC itself. It is possible that there are some more
> >> packages for which this applies (possibly including semigroupoids).
> >
> > Oops, I pushed ghc-array and ghc-containers just yesterday. Should I
> > revert?
>
> Yes, these packages better should not exist. You can revert the commits
> adding them and modify the package definitions of whatever new packages
> refer to them.
>
> We removed them some time ago when we cleaned up and updated most of the
> Haskell packages.
>
> --
> Ricardo
>
>
Hi, I saw this message yesterday and thought I'd change and fix my patches,
but had other things at that time. I should have sent a short message to the
bug containing the patches.
I'm going to clean up and send new patches without the ghc-array and so on.
(I tested several of the requirements/dependencies and I think I isolated
what needs to be declared).
pgp2IhiA9Eety.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature