help-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gpg --verify


From: ng0
Subject: Re: gpg --verify
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:32:33 +0000

On 17-02-17 14:14:03, Catonano wrote:
> 2017-02-17 13:45 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden>:
> 
> >
> > Catonano <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > $ ls
> > > Fedora-Workstation-25-1.3-x86_64-CHECKSUM
> > > Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-25-1.3.iso
> > > guixsd-usb-install-0.12.0.x86_64-linux
> > > guixsd-usb-install-0.12.0.x86_64-linux.xz.sig
> >
> > Looks like you’ve already unpacked the xz archive.  It should work fine
> > before unpacking.
> >
> >
> 
> Right, sorry for the noise
> 
> So, this is it now
> 
> $ gpg --verify guixsd-usb-install-0.12.0.x86_64-linux.xz.sig
> gpg: i dati sono probabilmente firmati in
> "guixsd-usb-install-0.12.0.x86_64-linux.xz"
> gpg: Firma eseguita in data mer 21 dic 2016 13:46:39 CET usando RSA, ID
> chiave 235FACAC
> gpg: lookup_hashtable failed: eof
> gpg: Firma valida da "rekado <address@hidden>"
> gpg: lookup_hashtable failed: eof
> gpg: ATTENZIONE: questa chiave non è certificata con una firma fidata.
> gpg:          Non ci sono indicazioni che la firma appartenga al
> proprietario.
> Impronta digitale chiave primaria: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888
> 235F ACAC
> 
> There' s a warning
> 
> data probably signed in "guixsd-usb-install-0.12.0.x86_64-linux.xz"
> ...
> this key is not certified with a trusted signature
> There are no indications that the signature actually belongs to its owner
> 
> is this good enough ?

Yes, this is local. I'm not sure which gpg version fedora has or
whatever your settings are (please don't paste them), but this is good
enough.
Newer GnuPG has the tofu functionality you could use for example (look
for tofu in the documentation of GPG).
-- 
ng0 -- https://www.inventati.org/patternsinthechaos/



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]