[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new GuixSD version?
From: |
Ethan Stefan Day |
Subject: |
Re: new GuixSD version? |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:23:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.1.0 |
On 07/20/2016 01:59 AM, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:45:49AM -0400, Ethan Stefan Day wrote:
>> If my concern is based on accurate understanding, I would be willing to
>> test it. I was about to reinstall GuixSD on metal for unrelated reasons.
>
> Yes, please report anything that's missing.
>
So I guess the installer was more resilient than I expected; it worked
fine. (using default desktop configuration on x86_64) It took a long
time, but from what Ludovic was saying, that was expected. Optional
details follow:
My initial plan was to run 'guix system init', look at what failed, and
try to resolve missing dependencies. So I ran:
time guix system init --fallback --keep-going /mnt/etc/config.scm \
/mnt &>> /mnt/unique-logging-dir-9855/run-one.log
It took about 6 hours (on my fairly powerful modern laptop).
run-one.log is 96.4 MB, so going through it by hand was not an option.
Luckily, the last line was:
Installation Finished. No error reported.
I have not done anything yet, but it boots and lets me log in as root.
If the log file is of interest, I am willing to share it if someone
provides a way to transfer it or gives me a hint about how to extract
the relevant information programmatically.
There was some other output from the system that resulted from that
command. I have no idea what it means. Also, it was copied by hand, so
there may be errors. here it is:
spurious SIGPOLL
spurious SIGPOLL
spurious SIGPOLL
spurious SIGPOLL
spurious SIGPOLL
[ 6791.830086] traps: test-libnm-link[4412] trap int3 \
ip:7fffffff9fe0 error:0
[ 6791.831123] NOHZ: local_sofirq_pending 282
[ 6791.832111] NOHZ: local_sofirq_pending 282
[ 6791.832991] NOHZ: local_sofirq_pending 282
[ 6791.833747] NOHZ: local_sofirq_pending 282
[ 6791.830059] perf interrupt took too long (2503 > 2500), \
lowering kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate to 50000
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- new GuixSD version?, Ethan Stefan Day, 2016/07/19
- Re: new GuixSD version?, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/19
- Re: new GuixSD version?, Ethan Stefan Day, 2016/07/20
- Re: new GuixSD version?, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/20
- Re: new GuixSD version?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/20
- Re: new GuixSD version?, Vincent Legoll, 2016/07/20
- Re: new GuixSD version?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/21
- Re: new GuixSD version?, Vincent Legoll, 2016/07/21
- Re: new GuixSD version?, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/21
- Re: new GuixSD version?,
Ethan Stefan Day <=