help-gsl
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-gsl] GSL 2.4 make check failing on Rocks cluster running CentO


From: Patrick Alken
Subject: Re: [Help-gsl] GSL 2.4 make check failing on Rocks cluster running CentOS 6.9
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:01:00 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2

Hello,

  It looks like its calculating the value correctly, but the test tolerance needs to be relaxed slightly. Can you locate this line in specfun/test_bessel.c:

 186   TEST_SF(s,  gsl_sf_bessel_j2_e, (1048576.0, &r), -3.1518539455252413111e-07, TEST_TOL3, GSL_SUCCESS);

and change the TEST_TOL3 to TEST_TOL4, and let me know if the test passes? If not try TEST_TOL5 and then TEST_TOL6, and tell me which one allows the test to pass.

Thanks,
Patrick

On 01/18/2018 03:56 PM, Eric Shell wrote:
Hello,

I'm trying to install GSL 2.4 on a Rocks cluster running CentOS 6.9, gcc
version 4.4.7.  I am running configure with just a --prefix argument.  make
succeeds without errors, but make check is failing on the specfunc test.
Here are the contents of the log file:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

======================================
    gsl 2.4: specfunc/test-suite.log
======================================

# TOTAL: 1
# PASS:  0
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

.. contents:: :depth: 2

FAIL: test
==========

FAIL: gsl_sf_bessel_j2_e(1048576.0, &r) [168]
   expected: -3.1518539455252412e-07
   obtained: -3.1518539455252539e-07 +/- 2.7994086564622246e-22
(rel=8.88178e-16)
   fracdiff: 2.0155588470164931e-15
  tolerance: 4.5474735088646412e-13
   value/expected not consistent within reported error
   -3.151853945525253879e-07  2.799408656462224591e-22
FAIL: Bessel Functions [407]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is this a known issue?  How can I address the underlying issue?

Thanks!

- Eric





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]