[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?

**From**: |
Rhys Ulerich |

**Subject**: |
Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable? |

**Date**: |
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:06:46 -0600 |

>*>> The documentation does not discuss whether gsl_integration_workspace is*
>*>> reusable. Is it? For example, can one allocate a single workspace, and use*
>*>> that to do two different integrations afterwards? Some of our tests with*
>*>> gsl-1.14 indicate that the answer is 'no'.*
>*> Do you have some test code demonstrating that 'no' result?*
>* To be explicit, I do think that they should be resuable. Each*
>* integration routine*
>* calls 'initialise()' (the source is located in*
>* integration/initialise.c) which should*
>* reset the integration workspace for a new integration each time.*
I too believe they should be reusable. I'm interested in Denes' code
that indicates otherwise because I believe it will uncover a bug
related to exactly the initialise() methods you mentioned.
- Rhys

**[Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**, *Denes Molnar*, `2011/12/01`
**Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**, *Rhys Ulerich*, `2011/12/01`
**Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**, *Andrew W. Steiner*, `2011/12/01`
**Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**,
*Rhys Ulerich* **<=**

**Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**, *Denes Molnar*, `2011/12/01`
**Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**, *Rhys Ulerich*, `2011/12/01`
**Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**, *Andrew W. Steiner*, `2011/12/01`
**Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**, *Denes Molnar*, `2011/12/01`
**Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**, *Rhys Ulerich*, `2011/12/01`
**Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**, *Denes Molnar*, `2011/12/01`
**Re: [Help-gsl] is gsl_integration_workspace reusable?**, *Rhys Ulerich*, `2011/12/01`