|
From: | Andrei Borzenkov |
Subject: | Re: Valid grub.conf locations |
Date: | Wed, 21 Jun 2023 14:31:52 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 |
On 21.06.2023 12:08, Ulrich Sibiller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 2:18 PM Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> wrote:RH grub unconditionally loads grub.cfg from $cmdpath (which they renamed to fw_path) without any way to override this behavior. I hesitate to call this improvement.Well, I cannot judge here. From my POV it looks reasonable to do so because you can then use the same efi file regardless of the boot method. The override should be added, though. YMMV.
You already can use the same EFI file regardless of the boot method. SUSE does it without any hacks.
(This brings up one question which somebody might know the answer: the Centos7 version of grub has 486 patches. I am wondering why these patches never made it to upstream. Is there simply lack of manpower? Have these patches never reached upstream? Have they been rejected?)Do you know anything about this?
It is quite possible that most of these patches are actually upstream patches.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |