Re: Nested std::tr1::bind problem

[Rodolfo Schulz de Lima]

Pedro Lamarão wrote:
> None of the candidate functions in the overload set, as given in the
> error diagnostic, take rvalues as arguments.

That's what I've thought. But if we use boost::bind in this example it 
would compile. IMHO I think using rvalues should be accepted because 
it's a common use case, and I doubt the standard would say otherwise. 
The bind's return functor should forward the arguments to the functor 
associated with it, so it should accept rvalues as well.

Regards,
Rodolfo Lima.