Re: member functions in several libraries

[Paul Pluzhnikov]

Kyuso Cahi <kyuso@softhome.net> writes:

A. Because doing so makes the conversation harder to read.
Q. Why should I not top-post?

Please do not top-post.

> Does this mean 

Does *what* mean?

It isn't clear what your question has to do with the message you
are replying to.

> I can't store member functions of the same class
> across several libraries?

You sure can.

> I would like to interchangeably link different implementation of a member
> function stored in different libraries.

Fine.

> Is there a better solution?

Better in what respect?
You didn't say what you don't like about the "store in different
libraries" solution, so it's hard to tell whether there is a
better one.

Cheers,
-- 
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.