[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: g++-2.95 statically compiling

From: Paul Pluzhnikov
Subject: Re: g++-2.95 statically compiling
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:34:34 -0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux)

fangee <> writes:

A. Because doing so makes the conversation harder to read.
Q. Why should I not top-post?

Please do not top-post.

> Following yuor suggestion I gave up statically compiling and I found a
> better (I think) solution: pass to the linker the option -Wl,-rpath.

You never explained what problem static linking was intended
to solve. Without knowing your goal, it is impossible to tell whether
'-rpath' is a correct solution, and whether better solutions exist.

In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]