[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-gnucap] Strange behaviour on .model definition, a bug?
From: |
al davis |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-gnucap] Strange behaviour on .model definition, a bug? |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:46:02 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
On Monday 12 March 2007 16:24, Rubén Gómez Antolí wrote:
> Again, Let's go to modify .model:
> .model Q2N3055 NPN (Is=974.4f Xti=3 Eg=1.11 Vaf=50 Bf=99.49 Ne=1.941
> + Ise=902.5p Ikf=4.029 Xtb=1.5 Br=2.949 Nc=2
> *+ Isc=0 Ikr=0
-- commented out
> + Rc=.1 Cjc=276p Vjc=.75 Mjc=.3333 Fc=.5 Cje=569.1p Vje=.75
-- this extends the previous line,which is a comment.
Therefore this is a comment too!
> + Mje=.3333 Tr=971.7n Tf=39.11n Itf=20 Vtf=10 Xtf=2 Rb=.1)
> * Texas Inst. pid=2N3055 case=TO3
>
Known bug .. or .. known difference from the way Spice is actually implemented,
as opposed to the way it is speced.
Work around: don't comment out pieces in the middle of a model.