[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Too fine design granularity leads to numerous macro/function/command
|
From: |
Hongyi Zhao |
|
Subject: |
Re: Too fine design granularity leads to numerous macro/function/command existed in Emacs. |
|
Date: |
Sat, 14 Aug 2021 15:25:36 +0800 |
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 3:19 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:29:38 +0800
> > Cc: help-gnu-emacs <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
> >
> > > The low-level infrastructure of the Lisp machine
> >
> > IMO, by saying ``Lisp machine'', it always means the operating system
> > is written in lisp, but this is obviously not the case of Emacs.
>
> No, I meant the Lisp machine that is part of Emacs core. IOW, the
> Emacs Lisp interpreter and bytecode-running code.
Can these components be called a ``Lisp machine''? I mean, if without
the OS it runs on, it can also be called a ``machine''?
Hongyi
Re: Too fine design granularity leads to numerous macro/function/command existed in Emacs., Emanuel Berg, 2021/08/13
Re: Too fine design granularity leads to numerous macro/function/command existed in Emacs., Arthur Miller, 2021/08/13