[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Quote by Knuth
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Quote by Knuth |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jul 2021 00:31:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jean Louis wrote:
>>> There are no millions of programmers using "literate
>>> programming"...
>>
>> Disregarding students and academics almost nobody.
>
> Documentation strings in Emacs Lisp and commentary are
> literate programming. Though we do not have some nice
> formatter which will convert each function into nicely
> printed PDF with sections and similar. I don't think it is
> hard to make it in Emacs Lisp.
But then all programming and programs that have string with
the purpose for humans to read are literate. I'm still looking
for an exact definition...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Quote by Knuth, (continued)
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/20
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/14
- Re: Quote by Knuth,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/14
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/15
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/18
- Re: Quote by Knuth, tomas, 2021/07/19
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/19
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/21
- Quote by Knuth, Christopher Dimech, 2021/07/21
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Emanuel Berg, 2021/07/21
- Re: Quote by Knuth, Gregory Heytings, 2021/07/21
- Quote by Knuth, lisa-asket, 2021/07/19