|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Is Elisp really that slow? |
Date: | Fri, 17 May 2019 16:17:56 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
On 17.05.2019 15:04, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Anyway, you seem to be agreeing with me, but this discussion started from Ergus giving an example of one such inconsistency. And I have yet to see you state a solid opinion about it in particular.A single example doesn't yet make a point. To prove we have a problem, much more than one example will be needed.
What point would I be trying to prove? That Emacs is outdated are people shouldn't be using it anymore?
I want us to *work toward* making Emacs more consistent, across all of its features. An example of it being non-consistent is not an argument, it's an opportunity to make it better.
As for my opinion on this, I make a point of not posting "me too" responses, if I don't have something more intelligent to add to the discussion. Especially a discussion as long as this one.
Since you're the person to make the ultimate choice, your silence should be taken to mean you don't see a reason to change things.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |