[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 14:31:36 +0300

> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <address@hidden>
> > I think it's just a bug: when left-word and right-word were introduced
> > only one pair of bindings was updated and not the other.
> I'm not sure it's a bug.  My guess is that it was by design
> (for whatever reason).  Perhaps Eli or someone else can
> enlighten us.
> I kinda doubt it was an oversight.  All of those bindings
> are together, and the person who changed the Meta bindings
> likely searched for `forward-word', not "[M-right]" or
> "(kbd "M-<right>")"...

I don't remember why I bypassed ESC <right> etc.  Maybe I wanted to
change as few bindings as possible.  Maybe I thought users of R2L
script are unlikely to invoke these commands via ESC.  Maybe I just
made a mistake.

If someone is annoyed by the difference (which should only be visible
in bidirectional text), feel free to make ESC do the same as Meta in
this case.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]