[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys

From: Robert Pluim
Subject: Re: ESC vs Meta for shifted keys
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:57:34 +0200

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> So Iʼve (finally) got an actual Meta key configured on my
>> keyboard. Iʼve always believed that Esc-as-prefix and Meta were
>> interchangable, but that doesnʼt seem to be the case:
> The ESC <-> Meta equivalence only holds for characters, not for
> "special keys" such as `left`, indeed.  Not sure why.


>> So this looks like Emacs is not taking into account the SHIFT modifier
>> here?
> What makes you think so?  The "translated from" clearly shows that Emacs
> saw the shift just fine.

You're right, I misinterpreted the results. It looks like emacs
ignores the shift if thereʼs no separate binding for the shifted
version, and runs whatever's bound to the unshifted version.

>> Or is there some default keyboard translation going on that I
>> need to disable?
> Why would you need to disable it?
> IOW which part of "running left-word when I hit M-S-<left>" annoys you?

This came up when running org, inside a table, where M-S-<left> and
M-<left> do different things, and neither are the same as
ESC-S-<left>. If the Esc <-> Meta were true here they would be easier
for me to type, although I can always rebind the ESC versions (or
retrain my fingers)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]