[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (interactive) call or form?

From: Marcin Borkowski
Subject: Re: (interactive) call or form?
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 21:48:28 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50

On 2018-04-09, at 16:39, Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden> wrote:

> Emanuel Berg <address@hidden> writes:
>> > So you think people understand "special form"
>> > but don't understand "form"?
>> In a way, yes, because "special form" sounds like something you don't
>> understand, while "form" sounds like something you would understand,
>> only you don't (probably), so it is more confusing.
> These words name different things anyway: the first one is about the
> binding of the function cell of the symbol `interactive', the other
> names the whole s-exp "(interactive ...)".  AFAIU the OP wanted a
> description of the latter.

I guess you're right.  Thanks!

Marcin Borkowski

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]