[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Sep 2015 04:36:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ian Zimmerman <itz@buug.org> writes:
>> But: even if the help is easy to offer, which it
>> isn't, and even if the help is offered, which
>> hasn't happened yet, it is still better to write
>> the SIEVE point blank. It might not be the Lisp way
>> (whatever that is) but it is the intelligent and
>> enjoyable way that will use a reasonable amount of
>> time to solve a problem the way it was intended to
>> be solved. Don't you think?
>
> Maybe. Depends how much effort one's willing to put
> into handling her mail, relative to other things, and
> how much of that to do now, relative to later. To take
> the extreme case, what if the OP wants to keep the
> rules in both formats and keep them in sync?
By the way, this is the second thread I'm in tonight
where "the OP" seems to be the one the least
interested in the discussion and our efforts to help!
This reminds me of always scaring away girls back in
elementary school. Maybe we should change our style?
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, b0ef, 2015/09/20
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Ian Zimmerman, 2015/09/20
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/20
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Esben Stien, 2015/09/20
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/21
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Esben Stien, 2015/09/22
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/22
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Ian Zimmerman, 2015/09/22
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/22
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, tomas, 2015/09/23
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/24
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, tomas, 2015/09/25
- Re: gnus Split Rules to SIEVE, Emanuel Berg, 2015/09/25