[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jul 2015 21:57:39 +0200 |
On 2015-07-19, at 15:26, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:
> On 07/19/2015 04:20 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>
>> Still not there - I can't assume that "newtext" will have the same
>> length as the thing it replaced...
>
> You can do the arithmetics there, or use a marker.
Arithmetic is fine (as Pascal showed in his last answer), markers not
(I'm in a string, not a buffer).
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
- A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Dmitry Gutov, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Message not available
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Barry Margolin, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/07/19
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: A variant of match-end, but after replacement?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2015/07/19