[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How the backquote and the comma really work?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: How the backquote and the comma really work? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:06:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
> I decided that the time has come that I finally
> approach the scary backquote-comma duo. (While
> I understand it superficially, I’d like to get it
> right and thoroughly this time.) So my question is
> whether my mental model (see below) is correct.
The backtick isn't complicated at all. Besides you got
it right.
Here is how it works:
'(this is not a five)
`(this is still not a five) ; no reason for backtick here
(let ((five 5))
`(now it is a ,five) )
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- RE: How the backquote and the comma really work?, (continued)
- RE: How the backquote and the comma really work?, Drew Adams, 2015/06/25
- Re: How the backquote and the comma really work?, Robert Thorpe, 2015/06/25
- Message not available
- Re: How the backquote and the comma really work?, Rusi, 2015/06/25
- Re: How the backquote and the comma really work?, Michael Heerdegen, 2015/06/26
- Message not available
- Re: How the backquote and the comma really work?, Rusi, 2015/06/26
- Re: How the backquote and the comma really work?, Michael Heerdegen, 2015/06/26
Re: How the backquote and the comma really work?, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/06/25
Re: How the backquote and the comma really work?, tomas, 2015/06/26
Re: How the backquote and the comma really work?,
Emanuel Berg <=
Re: How the backquote and the comma really work?, sokobania . 01, 2015/06/30