[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Always using let*

From: Emanuel Berg
Subject: Re: Always using let*
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:18:17 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> You mean "let, and not let*?" Because I use let all
>> the time and I don't think that is uncommon.
> No, I don't think I made a typo: you could remove
> `let' from Elisp and it would be pretty easy to
> rewrite all the code to use let* instead. In 99% of
> the cases it's just a matter of adding a *.

Yes, that's what I mean, you mean, let and only let
(i.e., not let*), because let's functionality is
covered by let* as well.

underground experts united

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]