[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:57:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Tim Visher <tim.visher@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Bastien <bzg@altern.org> wrote:
>> Tim Visher <tim.visher@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> It strikes me as something that calc or org might already do.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Yes, Emacs and Org could do this. You would need to let a table's
>> formulas be recalculated at each insertion (see post-command-hook).
>>
>> That said, those demos are shiny when watching for a few seconds,
>> but we you really edit a buffer, you don't really want text that
>> is *not* under point to change at each insertion. This is tiring.
>> At least this is how I feel it.
>
> I'd actually be quite satisfied with having to call something to have
> the results recalculated, how would I go about getting the actual
> calculations done though?
You mean C-c C-c on the #+TBLFM line ?
--
Bastien
- How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?, Tim Visher, 2014/01/27
- Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?, Bastien, 2014/01/28
- Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?, Luca Ferrari, 2014/01/28
- Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?, Tim Visher, 2014/01/28
- Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?,
Bastien <=
- Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?, Tim Visher, 2014/01/28
- Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?, Bastien, 2014/01/28
- Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?, Tim Visher, 2014/01/28
- Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?, Bastien, 2014/01/28
- Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver?, Tim Visher, 2014/01/28