[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding

From: Kai Großjohann
Subject: Re: DynamicBindingVsLexicalBinding
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:43:18 +0200
User-agent: Postbox 3.0.8 (Macintosh/20130427)

Phillip Lord wrote:
> None the less, I think you are hitting a strawman here; if Emacs went
> entirely lexically bound, I don't think that it necessarily follows that
> elisp will turn into Java.

Sorry, Phil, that's not what I meant.  I think I got carried away a
little there.  Even if Emacs were to move to Guile: Scheme has fluid-let.

All I wanted to point out is that this idea of dynamic binding is more
powerful than one might think at first.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]