[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:48:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> writes:
> In 1990 the main competition to emacs was vi
> In 2000 it was Word
What, Word? Word isn't even an editor, it is a bloody word
processor. You can't program or do any scientific or technical
work in Word. You can't even write a lousy crime novel in Word -
when you are done, the people at the publishing house has to
typeset it before they turn it to the people who (physically)
produce the books.
I have never heard of Google-docs or how that could be used as a
programming and/or document-producing interface, but I don't like
web programming, web tools, or the like. I did Javascript, PHP,
CGI, etc., at school, and besides HTML/CSS (which isn't
programming) I don't see the point in any of that.
--
Emanuel Berg - programmer (hire me! CV below)
computer projects: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
internet activity: http://home.student.uu.se/embe8573
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/08/26
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/27
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Marc Weber, 2013/08/27
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/27
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Marc Weber, 2013/08/27
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/08/28
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/28
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Jorge, 2013/08/27