[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process inste
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP) |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:05:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
Hi Emanuel,
>> BTW, it also seems something else is broken with your Gnus. Your
>> replies don't contain the message id of the article you're replying
>> to in the References header. E.g., your message I'm just following
>> up to should contain <87sizfgd3l.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> but doesn't.
>
> Interesting. Do you have any idea as to what that is, and what
> implications it has?
Newsreaders construct threads from the references, i.e., every article
mentions its ancestor articles. Since the references in your articles
are wrong, every followup you make creates a new thread instead of being
displayed as a child of the article you are replying to. It also breaks
Gnus' `^' and `A T' commands.
Bye,
Tassilo
- have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, John Leach, 2013/07/08
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/09
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, John Leach, 2013/07/12
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/15
- Message not available
- [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/15
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/16
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/16
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/16
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/17
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/19
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP),
Tassilo Horn <=
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/19
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/22
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/22
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/23