[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reverting but keeping undo
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: Reverting but keeping undo |
Date: |
Fri, 31 May 2013 00:05:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> > I wonder how that works.
>
> The revert is considered as a change like any other. I.e. the first
> undo step simply undoes the buffer modifications introduced by the
> revert.
That sounds good, thanks.
I wonder, however, if the user will notice when he passes that point
while successively undoing. I.e., for the case the user doesn't want to
undo prior reverts, maybe there could be some kind of warning in the
minibuffer.
Regards,
Michael.
- RE: Reverting but keeping undo, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Dan Espen, 2013/05/29
- Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Stefan Monnier, 2013/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Dan Espen, 2013/05/29
- RE: Reverting but keeping undo, Drew Adams, 2013/05/29
- Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/05/30
Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/05/30
- Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/05/30
- Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Stefan Monnier, 2013/05/30
- Re: Reverting but keeping undo,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Message not available
- Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Dan Espen, 2013/05/30
- Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Stefan Monnier, 2013/05/30
- Message not available
- Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Dan Espen, 2013/05/30
- RE: Reverting but keeping undo, Drew Adams, 2013/05/30
Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/05/31
Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Óscar Fuentes, 2013/05/31
Message not availableRe: Reverting but keeping undo, Dan Espen, 2013/05/31
Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Barry Margolin, 2013/05/31
Message not available
Re: Reverting but keeping undo, Barry OReilly, 2013/05/31