Re: Does anyone really use emacs in terminal?

[Jai Dayal]

That's not functionality, though. That's usability. If your argument
against Vim is "well, it's not emacs" then that doesn't answer the question
as we're talking about functionality, not usability.


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:43 AM, notbob <notbob@nothome.com> wrote:

> On 2013-05-09, Jai Dayal <dayalsoap@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Um... what exactly can emacs do that vim can't?  Or is vim not included
> in
> > "etc"?
>
> Edit in a single mode.
>