[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE versus emacs
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Oct 2012 06:01:29 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Sohail Somani <sohail <at> taggedtype.net> writes:
>
> Good enough for me most of the time, but yeah, it would be beyond
> awesome if Someone (TM) would use clang or something that understands
> C++ better to generate the TAGS files...
>
As an alternative you can give a try to eclim. It supports the
following features for C++:
Context sensitive code completion.
Searching.
Source code validation.
http://eclim.org/features.html
AFAIK the emacs eclim interface supports only Java currently,
but if you know Elisp then it should not be hard to add
C++ too (the infrastructure is there, you only have to add
the calls for the C++ commands of the eclim interface).
- Re: IDE versus emacs, (continued)
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/05
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Steinar Bang, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- RE: IDE versus emacs, Drew Adams, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Brandon Betances, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs,
Tom <=
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/19
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Vagn Johansen, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Vagn Johansen, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- RE: IDE versus emacs, Doug Lewan, 2012/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Vagn Johansen, 2012/10/06