[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: those funny non-ASCII characters
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: those funny non-ASCII characters |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Jun 2012 09:12:42 +0300 |
> From: rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 22:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
>
> On Jun 1, 9:23 am, Jason Rumney <jasonrum...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 31 May 2012 01:15:11 UTC+8, Buchs, Kevin wrote:
> > > Xah suggested I embrace Unicode. So I could use (prefer-coding-system
> > > 'utf-8) or the file variable: -*- coding: utf-8 -*-. Are there drawbacks
> > > to the former? What about opening an ASCII coded file? Can emacs
> > > properly detect it or does it come up as UTF-8?
> >
> > ASCII is a subset of UTF-8, so the problem you are imagining does not exist.
>
> This does not exactly work that way on windows.
> eg recently saw a description of how notepad put a BOM mark in a
> haskell-script which made the haskell scripts unrunnable
We are talking about Emacs, not about Notepad, so it's unclear to me
how what Notepad does is relevant to the OP's question.
- Re: those funny non-ASCII characters, Jason Rumney, 2012/06/01
- Re: those funny non-ASCII characters, rusi, 2012/06/01
- Re: those funny non-ASCII characters,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: those funny non-ASCII characters, Xah Lee, 2012/06/01
- Re: those funny non-ASCII characters, rusi, 2012/06/01
- Re: those funny non-ASCII characters, Xah Lee, 2012/06/01
- Re: those funny non-ASCII characters, rusi, 2012/06/01
- Re: those funny non-ASCII characters, Xah Lee, 2012/06/02
- Re: those funny non-ASCII characters, Xah Lee, 2012/06/02