[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: How to avoid loading file when just testing if function
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: How to avoid loading file when just testing if function |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:00:11 -0700 |
FWIW - I believe that someone else has already pointed out that the test for
whether a symbol is bound to a function and not just to an autoloaded object
(which is a promise of loading a function) is this:
(defun funp (symbol)
"SYMBOL's function definition is non-void and not an autoload object."
(and (fboundp symbol)
(not (eq 'autoload (car-safe (symbol-function symbol))
Such a function should perhaps be predefined for Emacs, but it is not. There
are at least three things to keep in mind when testing whether a symbol is
defined as an Emacs-Lisp "function", depending on what you need: `fboundp',
`functionp', and the above test (`funp').
Other tests are sometimes relevant too: `subrp' and `byte-code-functionp'. And
remember that `functionp' returns non-nil also for some non-symbols: lambda
forms, closures, and byte-code functions. And `fboundp' returns non-nil for
some non-functions such as macros and special forms.
Then there's the fact that a Lisp "function" does not necessarily implement a
(mathematical) function... Yes, the terminology can be confusing. The Elisp
manual is your friend, as is the Emacs source code.