|
From: | Pascal J. Bourguignon |
Subject: | Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle |
Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:18:44 -0000 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> writes: > What's the rationale for providing them? Are the definitions > obvious for collections that a not sets? The rational is to prove that Xah is dumb. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |