[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cthun-bot discussion

From: TheFlyingDutchman
Subject: Cthun-bot discussion
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 00:39:34 -0800 (PST)
User-agent: G2/1.0

On Mar 1, 3:43 pm, Cthun <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 5:51 PM, TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 5:52 am, Cthun<address@hidden>  wrote:
> >> On 01/03/2011 4:27 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> >>> Cthun<address@hidden>    writes:
> >>>> What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
> >>>> with Lisp, Kastrup? It is well known that it is all-caps languages
> >>>> like COBOL and BASIC that cause brain damage, Kastrup.
> >>> Today's Common Lisp is just as case insensitive as those.
> >> Except that it's not called "COMMON LISP", Kastrup.
> > Because it is not an acronymn, Cthun.
> What does that have to do with emacs, Dutchman?

Why did the Cthun-bot talk about COMMON LISP and then revert to emacs?
Are they doing any testing at all?

> The languages whose names are in all caps seem to be the ones that cause
> brain damage, Dutchman, and Common Lisp is not among them.

It is always refreshing when the Cthun-bot can spit out a sentence
that differs from it's normal small set, even if it doesn't make any

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]