|
From: | Uday S Reddy |
Subject: | Re: line-move-visual |
Date: | Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:13:55 -0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
On 6/15/2010 7:54 AM, Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
Well, C-f C-n is all you need. I mean, keep C-f pressed until the cursor reaches the column you want, you don't even need to count 76. And keep C-n pressed until the cursor reaches the line you want.
Except that pressing control-key for that long with your pinky is a health risk!But I feel this discussion is tangential. Most of us accept that visual line movement is a /good/ idea and we find it useful in lots of contexts. We are grateful for Stefan & co for thinking of it and implementing it.
The question is really whether it should have been made the default.Every time I narrowed down to that issue in this thread, the participants have fallen silent (first Xah Lee then Tim Cross, Alan Mackenzie and Stefan himself). I guess there is no good answer to it.
There is no need for us to beat a dead horse. If the developers accept that it is a bad idea to introduce backward-incompatible changes for flimsy reasons, Emacs will be a more useful system for all of us than it currently is.
Fortunately, nothing major is going to fall apart as a result of `next-line' changing its meaning. But I hope that we can arrest this trend right here so that we don't have to put up with more pain in future.
Cheers, Uday
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |