[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs build broken?

From: Tim X
Subject: Re: emacs build broken?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:00:17 +1100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux)

rustom <address@hidden> writes:

> On Jan 29, 9:50 am, rustom <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Jan 28, 1:50 pm, José A. Romero L. <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > (...)
>> > Didn't emacs move to bazaar for good? (
>> > BzrForEmacsDevs)
>> (...)
>> If we stuck around with things like cvs a bit longer the other part of
>> the acronym will also become true (GNU = Generally Not Used)
>> He also (see
> Ok so
> seems broken
> I wonder which is worse and antediluvian cvs or a broken bzr?

I've pulled down the emacs bzr repository both today and yesterday
on different machines (i.e. full/heave bzr checkout) and it works fine. 

Note that the URL for the bzr checkout is


is the log head for browsing the repository, which may well be broken.
(the difference is /r/ in one and /lh/ in the other).

On both systems, emacs built without errors. The initial heavy checkout
does take a while i.e. 20+ minutes on a fairly fast conneciton. However,
after that, updates are quite fast.


tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]