[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs build broken?

From: rustom
Subject: Re: emacs build broken?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:44:50 -0800 (PST)
User-agent: G2/1.0

On Jan 29, 9:50 am, rustom <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 1:50 pm, José A. Romero L. <address@hidden> wrote:
> > (...)
> > Didn't emacs move to bazaar for good? (
> > BzrForEmacsDevs)
> (...)
> If we stuck around with things like cvs a bit longer the other part of
> the acronym will also become true (GNU = Generally Not Used)
> He also (see

Ok so

seems broken

I wonder which is worse and antediluvian cvs or a broken bzr?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]