[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: basic question: going back to dired
From: |
Nikolaj Schumacher |
Subject: |
Re: basic question: going back to dired |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:47:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
"Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's not that "keybinding" is somehow extra good, it's that "shortcut"
>> is unusually bad.
>>
>> The name "shortcut" in most apps carries the implication that it's
>> somehow an unusual method of invoking something, which is only used in
>> rare circumstances for the absolute most heavily used commands (in these
>> apps, the "usual" method is a menu entry). This is not true in emacs --
>> keybindings are heavily used, and are "normal".
>
> Yes, the definition of "key binding" in Emacs is in itself quite good,
> but that does not help new users that are used to the word "shortcut"
> for similar things in other programs.
>
> At least it did not help me.
Of course the term shortcuts is something reminiscent of GUI programs.
In a text editor menu entries like `compile' might have a shortcut, but
calling C-b a shortcut seems weird.
I don't think there even has to be a name for it ... Help says: "It is
bound to C-b, <left>.", which sounds reasonable. So what problems could
a new user have? I can think only of one: Finding out _how_ to configure
the keys.
I just took a look at Eclipse (because that happened to be installed)
and it doesn't talk about shortcuts in the preferences, either. It just
has a table with "command" and "key sequence" on a page called "Keys",
yet its easy to find, because it's in a central place.
Maybe custom should support keymaps, and M-x customize-keys could solve
that problem...
regards,
Nikolaj Schumacher
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Tim X, 2008/07/31
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/31
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Thierry Volpiatto, 2008/07/31
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/31
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Thierry Volpiatto, 2008/07/31
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2008/07/24
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Miles Bader, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired,
Nikolaj Schumacher <=
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Kevin Rodgers, 2008/07/22
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, xraysmalevich, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Bastien Guerry, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/22
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Tim X, 2008/07/23
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/07/23
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/23
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Bastien, 2008/07/23