[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?
From: |
Hadron |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot? |
Date: |
Fri, 04 May 2007 14:37:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.99 (gnu/linux) |
Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org> writes:
> Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > As someone wishing to learn Emacs would you recommend I install Emacs
> 21
> > or Emacs-snapshot?
> >
> > You'd better stick with the current stable aka GNU Emacs 21.4
>
> It is so much worse in utf-8 support alone that I wonder what you base
> that recommendation on.
>
> Snapshot is a development version whereas GNU Emacs 21 is a
> *stable* version.
So?
It's not like the snapshot is falling over every 3 seconds.
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, (continued)
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Will Parsons, 2007/05/07
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/05/07
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/05/07
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Will Parsons, 2007/05/11
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/11
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Will Parsons, 2007/05/11
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/11
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Will Parsons, 2007/05/11
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?,
Hadron <=
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Sebastian Tennant, 2007/05/04
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, David Kastrup, 2007/05/04
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Xavier Maillard, 2007/05/05
Message not available
Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Mark Woodward, 2007/05/05