[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EmacsW32 invocation options
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: EmacsW32 invocation options |
Date: |
Fri, 4 May 2007 00:31:23 +0200 |
On 5/3/07, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
I don't see it as destructive since it does not make
anything cease to be that would otherwise continue to exist.
No, but perhaps it makes something not to be that could've been, were
the resources more abundant.
People speaking different languages is not generally considered
"destructive" either, even though many might derive from a common
ancestor.
Yeah, I'm sure the native speakers of latin do fully agree with you ;-)
Juanma
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, (continued)
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/02
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/05/02
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/02
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Kim F. Storm, 2007/05/03
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/03
- Message not available
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, David Kastrup, 2007/05/03
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Message not available
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, David Kastrup, 2007/05/03
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/03
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/04
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/04
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/05/04
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/05/04
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Kim F. Storm, 2007/05/04
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Peter Dyballa, 2007/05/04
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/05
- Re: EmacsW32 invocation options, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/04