[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: MY window tree!
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: MY window tree! |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:50:55 +0100 |
From your package:
;; Juanma Barranquero has pointed out there is a serious limitation in
;; this way of doing it when overlays with 'window properties are
;; used. The problem is that any pointers to windows are made invalid
;; since they are deleted. So in fact any code that relies on saved
;; pointers to windows will have problem if the window is one of those
;; that are involved here.
I was talking of modes that maintain a list of *overlays*, not
windows, but this other point, though not mine, is also valid :)
All in all, I think all this is complicated stuff for something that
would perhaps be easier at the C level, without the need to delete and
recreate windows.
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: MY window tree!, (continued)
- Re: MY window tree!, martin rudalics, 2007/01/14
- Re: MY window tree!, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/14
- Re: MY window tree!, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/14
- Re: MY window tree!, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/01/14
- Re: MY window tree!, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/14
- Re: MY window tree!, martin rudalics, 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: MY window tree!, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!, martin rudalics, 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!, martin rudalics, 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/01/15
- Re: MY window tree!, martin rudalics, 2007/01/15