[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dired vs MC
From: |
Tim X |
Subject: |
Re: Dired vs MC |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:18:34 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
"harry meyers" <hmeyers@literaturlatenight.de> writes:
> bcochofel schrieb:
>
>> I'm used to use mc (midnight commander) to manage my files because of
>> the 2 collum option. Recently I've changed to dired and I'm satisfied
>> with the option (setq dired-dwim-target t)...
>>
>> What I want to know is:
>>
>> Can I use one buffer of dired to access a ssh path?
>
> http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/AngeFtp
>
> With ange you can work on your remote files within a dired buffer
>
> harry
>
I think tramp is a better solution than angeFtp, plus you get added
functionality not available with basic angeftp. Tramp also comes as
part of emacs 22.
Tim
--
tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au