[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dired vs MC

From: Tim X
Subject: Re: Dired vs MC
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:18:34 +1100
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux)

"harry meyers" <address@hidden> writes:

> bcochofel schrieb:
>> I'm used to use mc (midnight commander) to manage my files because of
>> the 2 collum option. Recently I've changed to dired and I'm satisfied
>> with the option (setq dired-dwim-target t)...
>> What I want to know is:
>> Can I use one buffer of dired to access a ssh path?
> With ange you can work on your remote files within a dired buffer
> harry

I think tramp is a better solution than angeFtp, plus you get added
functionality not available with basic angeftp. Tramp also comes as
part of emacs 22. 


tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]