help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Transcript of Speech delivered by R. Aharon Cohen in Iran


From: thermate
Subject: Transcript of Speech delivered by R. Aharon Cohen in Iran
Date: 15 Dec 2006 10:53:51 -0800
User-agent: G2/1.0

http://www.nkusa.org/activities/Conferences/2006Dec12Iran.cfm

Related Links:

    * Transcript of Speech prepared by Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss (will
be available soon - please check back)
    * Transcript of Speech prepared by Rabbi Yisroel Feldman
    * Audio clip of Speech prepared by Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss (will
be available soon - please check back)
    * Transcript of Speech delivered by R. Aharon Cohen



address@hidden wrote:
> we know that The World Trade Center was intentionally demolished by a
> high-energy causal process physically unrelated to plane crashes and
> resulting fires
>
> we know that The World Trade Center was intentionally demolished by a
> high-energy causal process physically unrelated to plane crashes and
> resulting fires
>
> we know that The World Trade Center was intentionally demolished by a
> high-energy causal process physically unrelated to plane crashes and
> resulting fires
>
> address@hidden wrote:
> > 911 government account is now PROVABLY FALSE - Why are the BASTARDS
> > QUIET ?
> >
> > We know, the mass murder was done by YANK and ZIONIST Bastards
> > together, and blamed on OBL to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. Now, they
> > are back to square 1, on China's Back after Hainan, to increase the
> > currency value. Did anyone see those desperate pictures of Bush in
> > INDIA, sucking up to Manmohan Singh? Leaning extra six inches in the
> > photos towards Manmohan to FLATTER the Indian people. Certainly, there
> > is some BOOT-STRAPPING of Indian Image and economy to scare China after
> > having exploited their country for decades as a vast SLAVE LABOR camp
> > and then blaming them for running it !!! Remember, how Bush was unhappy
> > at the Death of Kalpana Chawala, cherry picked to create the MYTH of
> > US-India friendship? But the shuttle blew up - a divine act against the
> > ANTI-CHRIST. Now they have cherry picked another Indian girl. Yet
> > others are some Zionist Neocon advisors helping specific Indian
> > industries to make image making rise, eg Mettal. The idea is to
> > purposely sabotage China's global rise and steady progress. The Bush
> > and Neocon principle of politics is by deception, spying, scaring and
> > myth-making. It has been very successful in the PAST. The creation of
> > Israel on the land of Palestine was thru the false myth as the Rabbi's
> > of Neturei Karta have explained to us. The free book on the internet,
> > Min Ha Mitzer, From the Depths or "Holocaust Victims Accuse" [the
> > zionists] is available as a pdf for download. Its written wy Rabbi
> > Wasserman who was himself in the Aushwitz. Similarly, 911 was a fake
> > myth.Its best described in the words of Philosophy Professor James
> > Fetzer.
> >
> > footnote: Bush's pretense of RELOGISITY is a MYTH. He screwed numerous
> > girls in his drinking years.
> >
> > www.st911.org
> >
> > he Science of 9/11: What's Controversial, What's Not
> >
> > Propaganda by the government and the corporate media would have us
> > believe that the 9/11 "inside job" hypothesis is not merely
> > controversial but unsupported by proof. That is wrong. Academics,
> > experts, and scholars who have examined the physical evidence and
> > considered this event within its historical context tend to converge in
> > agreement that the inside-job hypothesis is, in fact, strongly
> > supported by the available evidence, while the version advanced in The
> > 9/11 Commission Report is not only false but provably false and in
> > crucial respects physically impossible. That the official account of
> > 9/11 is a lie and that 9/11 appears to have been an inside job is no
> > longer a matter of serious scientific debate.
> >
> > Even though the broad outlines of what happened are no longer
> > controversial--for example, we know that The World Trade Center was
> > intentionally demolished by a high-energy causal process physically
> > unrelated to plane crashes and resulting fires--the precise details of
> > how the perpetrators carried out the attack remains the subject of
> > intense controversy. From a political point of view, this controversy
> > may be insignificant. What we know with relative certainty about 9/11
> > is already the story of the century: it demands re-thinking our
> > history, our politics, perhaps even our way of life. But from a
> > scientific rather than political standpoint, controversial questions
> > about what may have happened on 9/11 are fascinating and
> > challenging--not least of all because they could lead to a better
> > understanding of 9/11 with respect to its social and political
> > significance.
> >
> > In an attempt to clarify these matters, Scholars for 9/11 Truth will be
> > hosting a conference entitled "The Science of 9/11: What's
> > Controversial, What's Not", to be held in mid- to late-July in Madison,
> > WI. I think we can all agree that the most important dimension of our
> > efforts is explaining why the "official account" that the government
> > has advanced cannot be sustained. Since there can be disagreements even
> > here about what we should or should not emphasize and what has or has
> > not been proven to an extent that is sufficient to emphasize them as
> > "refutations" of the government's account, I am inviting Barrie Zwicker
> > to organize the opening session, a panel discussion on "disproofs" of
> > the government's account.
> >
> > Following the opening session, there will be a keynote speaker and five
> > major sessions devoted to the issues that have tended to divide us. As
> > the program chair, I am inviting Steve Jones to organize a panel
> > discussion of the use of conventional means for destroying the Twin
> > Towers. [Editor's note: I regret to report that Steve Jones has
> > declined.] I am inviting Judy Wood to organize a panel discussion on
> > non-conventional means, including high-tech directed energy weaponry,
> > that might have been used to destroy the World Trade Center. I am
> > inviting Morgan Reynolds to organize a panel on planes/no planes at the
> > WTC and George Nelson on the Pentagon and Shanksville. Each of these
> > sessions would be of 2 1/2 to 3 hours duration. I anticipate there will
> > be a registration fee of $100 for the week-end long conference, which
> > will include a keynote address on Saturday evening.
> >
> > While the program is at its tentative and preliminary stage, I am open
> > to suggestions for possible participants and additional topics. There
> > may be changes in the individuals responsible for some of these panels,
> > but my expectation would be that their focus will remain the same.
> > Anyone who has ideas they would like to share with me is welcome to
> > forward them to me at address@hidden at their earliest convenience.
> > This conference should provide an opportunity for experts on complex
> > and technical scientific questions to explain their research and its
> > significance. My hope is that by "agreeing to disagree," and by
> > subjecting each others' research to rigorous but collegial criticism,
> > the attention-getting controversial aspects of 9/11 research may be
> > turned into a benefit, rather than a distraction, in the larger process
> > of seeking and exposing the truth about 9/11.
> > 
> > 
> > James H. Fetzer
> > Founder
> > Scholars for 9/11 Truth



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]