[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: help with M-x term
From: |
op132650c |
Subject: |
Re: help with M-x term |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:27:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
PTMail Webmail v2.0.10 |
> Is there some reason why you aren't using M-x shell?
I don't want to detour the attention about the question of William Daffer, but i
also prefer M-x term instead of M-x shell, because the output of M-x shell is
not well formatted compared to M-x term.
Now i put the following question:
What's the difference between M-x shell and M-x term?
How can i configure M-x shell to be well formatted?
One example of the bad formatation of the output of M-x shell, is when i do ls
-la.
I get the following:
]]] file1 ]]] file3^]]] ]]] file5^]]]
]]] file2 ]]] file4^]]] ]]] file6^]]]
With the M-x term i get well formatted:
file1 file3 file5
file2 file4 file6
Citando William Daffer <whdaffer@wabcmail.com>:
> yz7502@gmail.com writes:
>
> > Hi guys,
> > I have a question on the M-x term environment
> > I'm using ksh and I have some aliases defined in .emacs_ksh.
>
> Are you sourcing this file in your init files anywhere?
>
> > When I invoke M-x term, the aliases are not there.
> >
> > Should I define the aliases somewhere else?
>
> Is there some reason why you aren't using M-x shell?
>
> whd
> --
> DISTANCE, n. The only thing that the rich are willing for the poor to
> call theirs, and keep.
> -- Ambrose Bierce: _The Devil's Dictionary_
> _______________________________________________
> help-gnu-emacs mailing list
> help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
>
- help with M-x term, yz7502, 2006/07/12
- Message not available
- Re: help with M-x term, Tim X, 2006/07/14
- Re: help with M-x term, Sergei, 2006/07/14
- Re: help with M-x term, Tim X, 2006/07/14
- Re: help with M-x term, Sergei, 2006/07/18
- Re: help with M-x term, Tim X, 2006/07/18
Re: help with M-x term, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/07/13